No abstracts found. Try another search term or Show All
Abstracts
Bottom-up approach to incorporating WC to ERA
Why aren’t we successful at adequately incorporating widening countries into ERA?
Format: Fifteen-Minute Discussion Tables
Category: Interactive Session
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Petra VaculíkováThe EC is developing new ways of tackling this issue. However, it seems that nobody reached out to the individuals who are often the proponents of a bottom-up change of culture (sometimes even despite the current rigid system).
CARDEA
Research Managers are Invisible
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Practical Initiatives
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Mary Kate O'ReganCardea is the Roman Goddess of the hinge. Aptly named as Research Managers open Research Doors. Even though Research Managers have been strengthening Europe's Research and Innovation excellence for decades they are invisible from a policy perspective. CARDEA wants to change that!
ERAgoesGRA
Towards a Global Research - Management - Agenda: A look back from 2028
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Discussion Starter
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Bruno WoeranWhat if it's 2028? A globally confident community not influenced by or tied to national boundaries and/or obligations. The goal of this session is: to imagine the new insights and new possibilities that can inspire our work and tip us toward a better future by asking: “What if?”
EU Public affairs and RMA profession
EU Public affairs help to widen and deepen the RMA profession
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Discussion Starter
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Martijn GerretsenRMA is about designing and leading and managing processes, projects and/or groups. The output of these tasks can be improved when RMA experts are involved in the policymaking of f.i. the new EU framework program 2028-2034, which started in 2022.
HEU Missions: Designing a strategic approach
HEU Missions: Designing a strategic participation approach to improve multidisciplinary cross-faculty participation
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Massimo BusuoliA strategy to approach HEU Missions calls have been designed and implemented at NTNU. It is based on a set of actions: from a mapping of available expertises to the co-design of the participation approaches with involved researchers. The proposed session presents the whole process and outcomes.
HEU Strategic Partnerships: positioning management
NTNU Forum: Maximising impact deriving from HEU Strategic Partnerships involvement
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Massimo BusuoliSince the beginning of HEU, NTNU have started strategic participation of selected researchers into Strategic Partnership of interest. The impact deriving by this involvement, is guaranteed by through the hooking of these representative with a set of multidisciplinary thematic Fora: the “NTNU Forum"
Making a research integrity policy operational
Towards simplicity: making a research integrity policy operational to promote a culture of integrity
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Operational Lessons Learned
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Mr Sidney EngelbrechtThe focus of this abstract, therefore, is on the evolution and maturation process in an institution from informal to formalized approaches. However, the sparse regulatory environment requires one to lean heavily on international best practices in relation to research ethics and integrity management.
On the merits of non-competitive research funding
An assessment of the rationale and merits of non-competitive research funding
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Discussion Starter
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Arne VandenbogaerdeIn reaction to the disadvantages of a competitive funding landscape, calls for providing non-competitive research funding (NCF) have emerged. This presentation sets out the key issues and rationales with regard to NCF policies and discusses its potential effects.
SCOPE: A tool for responsible research evaluations
None
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: Practical Initiatives
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Laura HimanenThis session will provide the participants a practical tool for conducting more responsible research evaluations in a world where the ideals for responsible research assessment are spreading, but not enough expertise, nor relevant training is yet available.
Synergies to Support the Innovation Cycle
Ensuring the adequate funding and financing for Science Based Innovation
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: 1. Case Study
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Marta Sofia Guilherme Silva CandeiasThis session will present examples on how synergies between different funding mechanism, at regional, national and European level, were used to fund research and innovation activites.
University strategy implementation as sensemaking
The state of “not knowing it all” and the role of RMA as a coach
Format: Oral 30 Minutes
Category: 1. Case Study
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Jenni VirtanenWe discuss strategy implementation at the University of Helsinki with a case of building a roadmap for implementing multidisciplinary research themes. We study the narrative of the case with sensemaking perspective (e.g. Weick 1995) and focus on participatory methods and the role of RMAs.
Critical research management for complex problems
Lessons learned in establishing a major programme aimed at addressing complex global challenges
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: Operational Lessons Learned
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Daniel BlackAddressing increasingly urgent, complex global challenges requires the effective establishment and successful delivery of new, large-scale research collaborations that operate in new ways. Research management, its recognition, and funding play central roles in enabling this to happen.
Dynamic Dashboards Made Easy
Dynamic dashboards that interpret and analyse overwhelming amounts of data about research
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: 1. Case Study
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Kathryn Weber-BoerExamples of beautiful, dynamic dashboards, using multiple datasets to answer specific strategic research evaluation questions and generate insights about the trends, landscape, and impact of a selected university’s research: from funding to clinical trials and societal impact to scientific citation.
Ethics and integrity
Ethics and integrity: EARMA collaboration with the European Commission
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Borana TarajWe will reflect on the importance of ethics and research integrity for research managers and administrators in the European and global context and what EARMA is doing in this regard since 2018.
How to create and manage research budgets
The importance of creating budgets in consultation with post award teams for better end to end research management
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Connie KilleyCreating a budget as part of a research proposal is an important financial exercise. This sets the scene for post award, and research finance administrators if the proposal is awarded. Without a collaborative approach, things can go horribly wrong.
The future of data-driven decision making
None
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: Practical Initiatives
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Saara SantanenIn a world where data is power, we need to ensure data is available to drive decision-making and the future strategy of the universities we work in. But it’s a challenge. We shall showcase innovative and dynamic dashboards that help answer some specific questions.
The reform of research assessment an overview
The European process for the reform of research assessment and its implications
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: Methodological Session
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Dr Miklos GyorffiPractice of research assessment is long standing issue in research management. Recently a reform process has been started with the aim to form a coalition of institutions that would act in collaboration to create a common platform to achieve reform.
What is Lobbying?
Lobbying and Horizon Europe
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: Discussion Starter
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Sylvia McCarthyThis presentation analyses the role of lobbying in defining the structure of Horizon Europe and the routes by which research feeds into the EU policy making process.
Widening countries - where are the real gaps?
Opportunities and barriers for research and innovation performance in Widening countries and the role of RMA
Format: Oral 60 Minutes
Category: Interactive Session
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Zygmunt KrasinskiThe session in form of panel discussion will concentrate on the aspects related to: a) promotion of Research Managers position in Widening countries, b) influence of instability of R&I ecosystems on participation rates, c) how to build trust as a base for future projects.
3C = Creation, Collaboration, Continuation
Cross-collaborative science diplomacy for the future of creative industries, the bottom-up approach
Format: Pecha Kucha
Category: Discussion Starter
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Ms. Hana OwsiankováPresentation of the concept of bottom-up science diplomacy in the creative sectors that stands on 3C – educating in the Creation process, cross-sectoral Collaboration, sustainable and responsible Continuation.
A RMA's role in research collaboration
Stimulating research collaboration within university alliances with RMA support
Format: Pecha Kucha
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Lucy KerstensBuilding university alliances often starts at strategic level, but to stimulate research collaboration, the Research Support Offices can play an important role in helping identify useful and practical tools that facilitate and stimulate strategic inter-university research collaboration.
Brain gain policy
Brain gain policy: a best practice for the professional widening and development of other RMAs
Format: Pecha Kucha
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Fiorella GiacomettiThis presentation has the aim of sharing our best practices in terms of research talents recruitment: the BRAIN GAIN POLICY. We hope it can contribute to the professional widening and development of other RMAs.
Smart Research Support
Career and excellenced based stratification of funding portfolios
Format: Pecha Kucha
Category: Operational Lessons Learned
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Harald Hasler-sheetalInformation about career level, seniority, scientific productivity and research field allows for a efficient and effective stratifiaction into individual finding scenarios - as they individually illustrate the expected success of a individual for a specific call/instrument.
Scientific career path policy in RadboudUMC
Implementation of the Research leader policy – challenges and successes
Format: Poster
Category: 3. Good Practice
Topic: Policy, Strategy, Evaluation and Foresight
Martijn GerretsenIn the presentation the best practice and the pitfalls in policy development of the Scientific career path and its implementation in University Medical Centre will be discussed.