EARMA Conference Prague 2023

Abstracts

No abstracts found. Try another search term or Show All

Recognition and the RMA Domain

Conceptual Tools for Professional Development

Format: Oral 30 Minutes

Category: 2. Theoretical

Topic: Professional Development and Recognition

Heikki J. Koskinen

An important part of professional development is gaining a deeper understanding of crucial social and institutional aspects of one’s work environment. This presentation introduces concepts from contemporary recognition theory to increase our understanding of key elements of the RMA profession.

‘Small is beautiful’ or ‘bigger is better’?

‘Small is beautiful’ or ‘bigger is better’? Understanding the nature and role of small grant funding in knowledge production

Format: Oral 30 Minutes

Category: 2. Theoretical

Topic: Proposal Development

Dr Oliver Moss

In this paper, we draw upon the findings of a British Academy-funded research project to 1) critically examine the decline of small grant funding; and 2) consider the role of small grant funding in, inter alia, innovation and risk taking, and the maintenance and evolution of disciplines.

Job satisfaction of Japanese RMAs

Survey-based analysis of job satisfaction of research managers and administrators in Japan

Format: Poster

Category: 2. Theoretical

Topic: Professional Development and Recognition

Makiko Takahashi

RMAN-J, the Japanese association for university research management, surveyed the characteristics and intentions of its members in 2022. Task satisfaction was high, while the satisfaction with working conditions was relatively low. The result seems to reflect the specific environment of research man

Varieties of RCR in Europe

Categorization of European research integrity systems

Format: Poster

Category: 2. Theoretical

Topic: Open Science & Responsible Research & Innovation

Kalle Videnoja

Research is international, but research misconduct is investigated on organisational or national level. What do European national systems of research misconduct prevention and research integrity promotion have in common, and where can divergencies be located?