INORMS Congress Madrid 2025

PDF

The Triangle of Impact within Inclusion

The Triangle of Impact: Navigating Conflicts of Interest Through the Lens of Inclusion

Conference

INORMS Congress Madrid 2025

Format: Fifteen-Minute Discussion Tables

Topic: 9. Responsibility, Ethics, and Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in Research and Innovation

Abstract

In an increasingly complex research landscape, demonstrating the impact of research is essential for addressing societal challenges and justifying public funding. This is especially true for inclusion projects in health research, where involving marginalized groups can lead to more equitable and effective solutions.

Inclusion means actively involving marginalized communities, ensuring that their voices are integrated into both the design and outcomes of research. This is critical in health research because it ensures that interventions are relevant to those most in need.

However, demonstrating the long-term value of inclusion to funders can be challenging, as they often prioritize short-term, measurable results. Ethical responsibility in these projects, however, requires that the impact on these communities be meaningful and beneficial in the long run. Balancing these two competing interests is a difficult challenge for inclusion projects.

To better grasp these conflicts, we use the "Triangle of Impact" which highlights the roles of Research/Academia, Funders, and the Public, showing how their interactions can create both opportunities and challenges, particularly when their goals or expectations regarding impact differ.

A health literacy project focused on Austrian homeless people serves as an example of how inclusively designed research can improve outcomes. By involving the homeless community in the research process, the project not only addresses their specific needs but also ensures that the results are sustainable and meaningful. Yet, demonstrating the long-term impact of this inclusive and ethical approach remains difficult, as funders may prioritize more immediate outcomes.

Participants of the table discussion will focus on the relationship between researchers and funders through the Triangle of Impact with the above example to illustrate how different impact measurement criteria can create tensions. Together, we will explore potential solutions for bridging these gaps and making the value of inclusive and ethically sound research more visible to all stakeholders.